Jesusist* - Continued Part 4

The Kingdom of God is relationships.  Relationships are not a byproduct of the Kingdom, they are the Kingdom. Those who are actually following Jesus, rather than claiming to follow him, not only accept this reality – they experience it and live it out day by day.  The bottom line of Christianity is theological.  The bottom line of God’s Kingdom, according to Jesus, is relational. Jesus’ discussions on prayer, giving, forgiveness, judgment, eternal life and the like all example and confirm relationships as most important. 

This simple and straightforward reality is also confirmed in Jesus’ answer to questions four and five posed in the first of these writings.  According to Jesus, what is the purpose of the Scriptures; and what is the only marker which confirms someone who is his follower? The answers of Jesus and the answers of religion to these questions are not the same.

If one googles the purpose of Scripture a ton of information is offered from a wide range of Christian sources. Unfortunately, what one doesn’t find from those resources is Jesus’ answer. His answer is direct and crystal clear.  It was given while he was talking with the Scripture experts of his day. He said: “You search the Scriptures, because you think you will find eternal life in them. The Scriptures testify of me, but you refuse to come to me for life.” The primary purpose of Scriptures is not to offer promises, principles, truths and history upon which to build one’s world view. Scriptures’ purpose is to inspire only one response.  A personal, relational interaction with the person of Jesus who is life. Over the centuries multiple uses of the Scriptures have been engaged by a wide range of individuals, organizations and religions and so it continues to this very day. However, Jesus offers only one purpose for which they were given.  To fail at this purpose by those claiming to follow him is to fail completely. 

As to the question of validation for those who are actually following him, his words leave no room for debate. This universal identifier is given in terms of a command: “I am giving you a new command. You must love each other, just as I have loved you. If you love each other, everyone will know that you are my followers.” Everyone, the world, will know his followers by how they love.  It is exclusively a relational marker; no theological examine needed or required. Theology, historic information and ecclesiastical rubrics not included or allowed.    

The focus of a Jesusist* (please refer to part one) is Jesus and his person, instructions, teachings and conclusions.  His ideas become yours, his answers to questions become your answers.  A Jesusist* orders their thoughts, opinions, living and loving according to him.  What would it be like if just those who claim to follow him (2.3 billion) actually did?  

*not the Urban Dictionary Term

Jesusist* - Continued Part 3

Jesus comes to earth to clarify the person and purposes of God.  He said: “Everyone who believes in me also believes in the one who sent me. And everyone who sees me sees the one who sent me.” 

One of the great tragedies in current religious thought is what it has done to distort the reality of belief.  The dynamic, definitions and affirmations in religious thought all revolve around one’s theological considerations. Belief is admitting or agreeing with certain historic and theological conclusions.  However, the original term, in all of its forms, is a relational term not a theological one.  It means to rely on or have confidence in; and in this case the reliance and confidence is in a person not a principle, fact, concept or promise. The work of God, according to Jesus, is to believe in (to rely on and have confidence in) the one God sent.   

The emphasis and focus of religion are on informational accuracy.  While informational accuracy is not a bad thing it, according to Jesus, is not the most important thing.  Earth is riveted on informational accuracy while God and his kingdom are all about relational authenticity. This brings us to the third question posed in the first of these writings.  According to Jesus, what is the definition of eternal life?  His answer is like reading a dictionary.  He said to his Father: “This is eternal life: to know you, the only true God, and to know Jesus Christ, the one you sent.”  Eternal life, in the thinking, living and praying of Jesus is a relationship not a theological conclusion. There is nothing in his definition about Lordship, confession of sins, the authority of Scripture, water baptism, tithing and the like. Eternal life is not knowing about God or Jesus, it is in knowing them in an ongoing, authentic relationship. 

The Scriptures record a common experience in the life and times of Jesus which highlight the monumental difference between accurate information and authentic relationship.  Almost everywhere Jesus went there were individuals who knew the exact information about his identity.  It’s striking to note that these individuals were not his own followers nor were they the experts in Scripture.  It was the demons and the people they inhabited.  They would cry out about the facts of his identity -- always accurately. However, they were not in an authentic relationship.  His response to those who had accurate information but not an authentic relationship was always the same. He would tell them to be quiet and stop talking – even though they were saying true things about him.  

There is an eternity of difference between knowing about someone and in actually knowing them. Simply put: you know if you know someone AND you know if you don’t. You know if you only know about someone and have never really met them. Religion wants people to “believe” in Jesus the way 330 million Americans believe in George Washington, the nation’s first president.  We know about George but no one today actually knows him.  The beauty of Jesus and his Father is that they are to be known and not just known about.  This is a function of spirit, as he explains numerous times in the four accounts. According to Jesus, it is a function of spirit but no less real than a physical encounter. He put it this way: “My Father has given me everything, and he is the only one who knows the Son. The only one who truly knows the Father is the Son. But the Son wants to reveal the Father to others, so they can know him too … blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”

 *not the Urban Dictionary Term

Jesusist* - Continued Part 2

When Jesus came to earth did he think he would change the world or was he just killing time until we killed him?  How one thinks about and answers this question is critical.

Not long ago the opportunity to talk at a four-year Bible College presented itself.  There were a couple hundred students plus faculty and staff all gathered in the main auditorium.  To begin the time together I asked if this was a Christian College? The reply was a strong affirmative from all across the room.  Then I asked what is a Christian? The answer was almost in unison from the entire group.  A follower of Jesus was the answer.  With such a strong and conclusive response, I proceeded to ask the first five of the six questions posed in part one of this writing. Answers were called out to each of the questions. At the end of this inquiry an identical result occurred each time. Not one, including faculty and staff, had been able to give Jesus’ answers to the questions.  They had lots of answers but none of them were Jesus’ answers. Shouldn’t this bring great concern to a group of people claiming to follow him?  

The first question (According to Jesus how do we know our sins are forgiven?) is one Jesus answered nine different times in seven different settings.  His answer was always the same. If we forgive we will be forgiven.  Conversely, if we don’t forgive we will not be forgiven.  This means that anyone can know immediately if they are forgiven or not forgiven.  No religious, historical, or theological information, training or practice is required.  A simple (not always easy) measure for each person (now 7.7 billion) to assess their own status regarding forgiveness.  Tragically, this answer is not the answer or practice of Christianity. 

We are told that approximately one third of the world identifies as Christian.  That’s somewhere north of two billion people; people who claim to follow Jesus.  If two billion people started forgiving all others the way they’ve been forgiven would our world change?  How long would it take? Perhaps 36 hours because all the phone lines would jam. Think of this.  No further activity, organization, sending, building, training, fund raising, praying or preaching required … and the world changes! 

The second question (According to Jesus how does one avoid God’s judgment?) is another question Jesus answered consistently and specifically.  Do not judge others and God will not judge you.  Do not be hard on others and God will not be hard on you.  Once again this is not the answer Christianity offers its adherents and it is not its practice.  Yet, if two billion plus people all stopped judging others would our world change? How long would it take?  OMG … it just changed a second time without any further activities. The civil war in South Sudan is over. The Middle East is at peace.  The Congress of the United States is functioning again.  And the list of beautiful changes would go on and on.  

So, what should we do?  What does Jesus tell those who are following to do?  To remove the beam from your own eye. Am I forgiving all others?  Am I refusing to judge others?  This is the only beginning for anyone who will actually follow him.  And "follow me" is the only invitation, calling Jesus has ever issued to a human being.  

*not the Urban Dictionary Term

Jesusist*

The term "Jesusist"* came into my thinking from an unlikely story and an unlikely person.  The events took place in Nepal when a Maoist Communist revolutionary had an encounter with Jesus of Nazareth. It was not a term he used but his story led to it and the reality it implies. 

His encounter with Jesus changed the course of his life's trajectory. It didn't deny how he used to live and think; it transformed it.  In conversation with a mutual friend the former Maoist explained the difference between a Christian and a Follower of Jesus by clarifying the difference between a Communist and a Maoist.

A Communist is a person committed to the ideals of Communism. They draw from all sources regarding the principles and ideas of this political ideology (Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, etc.) with the commonly held concepts such as public ownership of all properties, the absence of social classes and the creation of a communist society.  Committed to such ideals they order their thinking, living and political activities. A Maoist, on the other hand, is committed to Mao and his ideas such as his central principle of permanent revolution and that political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. In short, Mao's thinking becomes your thinking.  His answers to questions become your answers. You order your thinking and life’s activities exclusively to his ideas.

A Christian is actually committed to the concepts and ideals of Christianity. Eternal life, forgiveness of sins, the substitutionary death of Jesus on the cross, etc. They welcome ideas from a wide range of Christian sources both written and spoken. He went on to note that while Christians claim to be followers of Jesus, in practice it is often not the case.  His conclusion? Our Nepali friend had decided to respond to his encounter by following Jesus. Jesus’ thinking would become his thinking.  Jesus’ answers to questions would become his answers. His thinking and living are now being transformed from a Maoist to a “Jesusist”*.

Am I really following Jesus?  Here’s a simple assessment.  Answer the following.

According to Jesus:

1.     How do we know our sins are forgiven?

2.     How does one avoid God’s judgment?

3.     What is the definition of eternal life?

4.     What is the purpose of the Scriptures?

5.     What is the only marker which confirms someone who is his follower?

6.     What is the purpose of money? 

  

If we’re following Jesus shouldn’t his answers be our answers?  If our answers aren’t the same as his, shouldn’t those actually following him change their answers? Practically, if we’re giving answers different than his, shouldn’t we have the integrity to stop telling others that we’re following him?

*not the Urban Dictionary Term